top of page

 

Predicting Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the General Population Using Electronic Health Records

Jessica Perry, MSc https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-5024Jennifer A. Brody, BA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8509-148XChristine Fong, MSc https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5090-273XJacob E. Sunshine, MD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9133-6922Vikas N. O’Reilly-Shah, MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0741-0291Michael R. Sayre, MDThomas D. Rea, MD, MPH https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5143-9342Noah Simon, PhDAli Shojaie, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8846-3533Nona Sotoodehnia, MD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2705-6237, and Neal A. Chatterjee, MD, MSc https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8290-127X nchatter@uw.eduAUTHOR INFO & AFFILIATIONS

Circulation

Volume 150, Number 2

https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069105

840

​

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The majority of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) occur among individuals in the general population, for whom there is no established strategy to identify risk. In this study, we assess the use of electronic health record (EHR) data to identify OHCA in the general population and define salient factors contributing to OHCA risk.

METHODS:

The analytical cohort included 2366 individuals with OHCA and 23 660 age- and sex-matched controls receiving health care at the University of Washington. Comorbidities, electrocardiographic measures, vital signs, and medication prescription were abstracted from the EHR. The primary outcome was OHCA. Secondary outcomes included shockable and nonshockable OHCA. Model performance including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and positive predictive value were assessed and adjusted for observed rate of OHCA across the health system.

RESULTS:

There were significant differences in demographic characteristics, vital signs, electrocardiographic measures, comorbidities, and medication distribution between individuals with OHCA and controls. In external validation, discrimination in machine learning models (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.80–0.85) was superior to a baseline model with conventional cardiovascular risk factors (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.66). At a specificity threshold of 99%, correcting for baseline OHCA incidence across the health system, positive predictive value was 2.5% to 3.1% in machine learning models compared with 0.8% for the baseline model. Longer corrected QT interval, substance abuse disorder, fluid and electrolyte disorder, alcohol abuse, and higher heart rate were identified as salient predictors of OHCA risk across all machine learning models. Established cardiovascular risk factors retained predictive importance for shockable OHCA, but demographic characteristics (minority race, single marital status) and noncardiovascular comorbidities (substance abuse disorder) also contributed to risk prediction. For nonshockable OHCA, a range of salient predictors, including comorbidities, habits, vital signs, demographic characteristics, and electrocardiographic measures, were identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a population-based case–control study, machine learning models incorporating readily available EHR data showed reasonable discrimination and risk enrichment for OHCA in the general population. Salient factors associated with OCHA risk were myriad across the cardiovascular and noncardiovascular spectrum. Public health and tailored strategies for OHCA prediction and prevention will require incorporation of this complexity.

bottom of page